“...he should be disclosing his affiliation, paid or not, that when he comments, further clarifying that they are his or on behalf of the campaign, and if the latter, if they are endorsed by or approved by the campaign. That is all. It is really simple....”
*********************************************************************************
It’s that simple, huh? Do you realize that without a doubt, MANY, MANY folks who post on these boards have an affiliation (paid or not, as you say) with a campaign of someone who is running for office. And, I’m pretty sure not all of them are Republicans. Since I have volunteered to help in various campaigns ...should I be required to “disclose” that everytime I post.
You, IMHO, are a disgrace and would do well working for organizations such as as the “John Doe Investigations” DA (look it up if you claim not to know of it). Such efforts are typically ‘RAT initiated. You’re in pretty disreputable company in my eyes.
Never received a dime for volunteering, starting with Al Haig, Steve Forbes, the County GOP, Fred Thompson and now Ted Cruz. Couldn’t volunteer for the Reagan campaign as I was in uniform.
Cruz is desperate and probably “DONE”. None of this is good news for him. He is an unhappy candidate and it’s starting to show. This is the proof and it all goes viral, sooner than later.
The benefits or merits of this “raw video” crap is not only ridiculous, but NON-EXISTANT. Excusing it in various rhetorical fashion is embarrassing, I should think.
“No Fun Ted”. (:(
Do I have to “disclose” that I’m a Cruz contributor? Perhaps folks think that I’m “buying” Sen. Cruz. LOL!!