http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”
We have an epidemic of this?
I have seen some sexual non-conformists that I would decline to seat in my restaurant, if I had one -- such as the guy walking down the street wearing a leather vest, chaps open at the back, cowboy boots, and nothing else. (True story.) I'm sure HRC believes this sort of thing must be protected. But I do not believe LGBT people who are not moonbat mad and who behave as reasonable carbon based life forms are being bounced out of restaurants.
The real problem with this kind of legislation, IMHO, is that it makes it very difficult and legally hazardous to enforce boundaries against really bizarre behavior. These \bills are presented as mere non-discrimination measures. Their real effect, and I suspect their real purpose, is to smash any barriers against freak show behavior.
This annoys GBLTs and non-GBLT liberals sharp enough to figure it out. Some try to correct me saying it is LGBT. My reply is that I didn't know that the 'L' part was more important than the others. This annoys them again allowing me to get extra mileage from the point.
I also point out how it is interesting that they have to keep adding letters to get a large enough group to be statistically significant.
"Ceterum censeo 0bama esse delendam."
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
” I will continue to fight so that LGBT Americans and families can live, work and pray free of discrimination.”
-—to Whom are they actually praying?
for later
Strap on nose extenders for Huma?
Translation...
The American people must be forced to play along with your delusions and I’m the one who will make it happen.
![]() |
Nothing is bold about perversion, nor is pandering in politicians. Bold would have been to stand against immorality, that especially from a Clinton would have been unpredictable and bold.
This, not so much.
What Year is Hillary living in ?
I absolutely believe the opposite.
Unless PIAPS can find the section of the Constitution that protects perversions (as clear and explicit as the Second Amendment), it can/will never happen!
You may not have noticed, but there is huge and growing swing of the National Societal Pendulum.
When I meet what is clearly a member of the GLBTMQWERTY deficient, I am polite, and as brief as possible, and, subsequently, stay as far away as I can.
There can never be a law that can force me to do otherwise.
meanwhile.......she aides supports and encourages the muslims who will make the LGBT crowd thier first head lopping party