How can it be that the NYTimes doesn’t understand something? Aren’t they the smartest folks around?
Sane people struggle to understand the New York Times.
No doubt.
These Ministry of Propaganda minions can’t understand the Trump thing because they don’t have plexiglass navels to see the real world.
NY Times, Sane People Struggle To Understand Donald Trump's Appeal
Should Read:
Sane People Struggle To Understand Why Anyone Reads The NY Times
That's much better...
Doncha think?
Most interesting primary campaign of my lifetime.”
Mine, too. First voted in 1958. This one just Trumps all of them put together. What a hoot!
The politically correct house of cards is falling and it’s builders are freaking out.
There is no “hate” in Donald Trump on these issues.
He is just saying we should enforce existing law.
Why does this writer hate the US?
We are done with IDEOLOGY, especially liberal and mealy mouthed RINO ideology.
Working on “They all have to leave” and “Secure the border and controlled legal immigration” ideology.
What a condescending political class we have. While I do not support Trump I completely understand what’s happening. These are normal everyday voters who are sick of both party’s screwing up. He’s addressing the core problem. No leadership and no effort to actually help Americans succeed.
“Donald Trump is a racist, sexist hypocrite who doesn’t understand the economy (or basic math) and probably doesn’t have anything resembling an inner life”
These people lash out with accusations stated as fact but have no basis in reality. They want to define what these things mean and then apply them to anyone who disagrees with them about anything. Smear tactics.
And how would he know about someone’s “inner life”? And why is it any of his business?
As far as math and economics, I think I’ll give billionaire Trump the benefit of the doubt over this j-urinal-ist.
Sane people never read the NYT.
Fortunately many of us understand the progressive psychosis, so we can easily imagine why they would ‘grapple’ with simple concepts that collectively motivate free societies, like self preservation, the visceral reactions to bullying & censorship, the desire for free and open expression, or fairness (as in having a say in how much of what one earns should be distributed to those who did nothing to earn it) and why people would be attracted to candidates who openly address them.
Yakas. Wondering if that rhymes with jackass. He reads like one.
That’s because they gave up trying to understand the New Yawk Slimes’ clueless editorials and needed something to do.
They are pissed. Love it.
I have come to believe that the ‘talking heads’ and the MSM think that they are so correct in everything they say that we, as idiots, are going to swallow every word they say...
I can see that as this goes along, they are really getting insane, and when someone talks back to them, example as Carson did today, they don’t know what to do...
I am loving this election more and more everyday...I first voted in the Kennedy-Nixon election in 1960....
“Management” It was so simple and perfect yet it still fly’s over their heads. Or does it? I think the hyperbole dam is going to burst.
They are wrong. It is mostly illegals.
NYT needs to spend some time in the sane flyover country.
Who is idiot Andrew Kaczenski?