Yes, I do understand all of the points about immigration you’ve laid out.
But if you agree with Coulter that abortion doesn’t matter until immigration is fixed, it’s just another example of conservatives adopting liberal views in order to support a liberal (Trump)...now, shamefully, even to the point of trying to minimize abortion.
That view is completely incompatible with conservatism. Go ahead and tell it to a single baby as that child is being torn apart and sucked out of the womb, or having an instrument shoved into his/her skull. “Sorry, until the border’s closed, you just don’t rate!”
And you know what you can do with your “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” That term more accurately describes conservatives who are falling all over themselves for a self-described Democrat.
"But if you agree with Coulter that abortion doesn’t matter until immigration is fixed, it’s just another example of conservatives adopting liberal views in order to support a liberal (Trump)...now, shamefully, even to the point of trying to minimize abortion.That view is completely incompatible with conservatism."
You fail on logic as well.
All the (R) nominees are pro-life, thus all the ones elected President are always pro-life. And what has it got us? What can a perfect Presidential candidate's opinion on abortion ever get us?
You need to come to grips with the reality - no candidates' opinion on Abortion means anything in light of Roe v Wade, and a country more than half full of narcissists and evil, near-Nazi-like stooges. It has as much real bearing on policy and change of heart that anything else might. You might as well worry about what football team they root for or how they wear their hair.
I don't want to call you insane but the classic definition is doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result. Yet here you are obsessing over this "conservative" litmus test, but one that will NEVER EVER get a chance to be utilized even *IF* that candidate could get to the White House in the first place.
Furthermore, there are foot soldiers in the war on the Nazi Abortion cult who are actually doing stuff - successfully as we speak. These folks with the videos, and the dripping releases, who clearly learned from O'Keefe and others, are *really* making progress. They are thinking outside-the-box. You however, are NOT.
You are laboring under the misconception that we elect a tyrant for four years who will singlehandedly make everything alright. However, that belief-system or argument has a fatal flaw. It literally means that whatever wonderful results we get in "our" President can simply be undone by the election of "their" President in the next cycle. It promotes an oscillating nation with a set of values based on majority rule.
"And you know what you can do with your “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” That term more accurately describes conservatives who are falling all over themselves for a self-described Democrat."The label fits your postings here, but if you truly hate it then I will refrain. However, Reagan actually was a (D)emocrat, of the FDR variety no less, and Trump is far more party agnostic than any other to come before him. But why the obsession with the (D) label? Are you saying that is significant? What about Zell Miller (D) versus Romney (R) or any almost any other (R)epublicrats?