Exactly. We have libs pushing their a pro-amnesty candidate and defending it as it if were a good thing. One even said it was "fair". How is it "fair" to the millions of Americans who have lost their jobs to the ILLEGAL hordes? All candidates have their downsides, we know that. But when one touts amnesty as if it is a good thing, that is a major negative, and damned good reason to reject said candidate.
Thae want Amnesty. They want RINOs. They want SoCons to go to hell. They want everything DU wants.
When Rick Perry wanted no fence and did his theater act, they flocked to him. Trumps act? Same people. Same flocking.
Christe. Coulter. Romney. Rubio. Pick a RINO with a liberal position Pick a rino PUSHING a liberal position. There they are defending them. There they are screaming about not questioning their conseratism while making every excuse under creation why conservatives must moderate so that the leftist RINO can win, sell books, keep their radio show going. Whatever.
Anything but backing a conservative.
“Oh we supportex X in the primary!”
Really? But when the chips were down they backed a liberal. Thats like saying “I didn’t support the gang rape when they planned it but I had to when it happened.”
And most of them supported a RINO in the primary and hope we didn’t remember.