You have stated a personal opinion. The courts have had a different opinion.
Tisdale v. Obama, U.S. District Court Judge John A. Gibney, Jr.: “It is well settled that those born within the United States are natural born citizens.”— Tisdale v. Obama, U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Virginia, January 23, 2012.
Voeltz v. Obama, Judge John C. Cooper, Leon County, Florida Circuit Court Judge: “In addition, to the extent that the complaint alleges that President Obama is not a “natural born citizen” even though born in the United States, the Court is in agreement with other courts that have considered this issue, namely, that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”—September 6, 2012
Allen v Obama, Arizona Superior Court Judge Richard E. Gordon: “Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent in construing the United States Constitution, and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), does not hold otherwise.”—Pima County Superior Court, Tuscon, Arizona, March 7, 2012
I suspect that the courts will have the last word regarding Senator Cruz’s status as well.
These are unpersuasive arguments; by the same token we should accept that obamacare is constitutional because the supreme court said so.
I don’t disagree that cowardly, ignorant and corrupt courts have ruled in o’s favor on this.
I don’t think we’ll ever get the horses back in the barn, but i also think there could be some poetic justice in having an anti-obama,ted cruz, who while himself is a citizen by statute (not a natural born citizen) repeal o’s signature law.
In a way, the situation is almost too crazy to believe...