You were inferring that you were voting for a perfect candidate, I wonder who that was.
Stop trying to assign our opinion. That’s a tactic used by Alinskyesque “progressives.”
The only ones talking about a “Perfect Candidate” are the Republican Liberal squad members like YOU! I’ve only said I want a candidate that isn’t a liberal (Jeb, Christy, etc...).
That means I want a candidate who doesn’t back stab the parties Conservative base. That doesn’t sound like a “perfect candidate,” it just sounds like one that isn’t a freakin traitor.
The GOP hands you a crap sandwich, you scarf it down and ask for another. It’s time to remind them that THEY WORK FOR US!
The reason for my observations and questions was that in 142 you seemed to be suggesting that you weren’t going to have to vote for the lessor of two evils.
You used the illustration; “That’s like choosing whether to have your daughter brutally raped and severely beaten or instead to be brutally raped and mildly beaten. Some of us believe the rape of our daughters is unacceptable.”
The inference being (as I read it) that you had found someone without sin.
I’m telling you, if you plan to vote in the Presidential Election, you are going to be forced to chose between the lessor of two evils. No matter the primary outcome.