[napscoordinator]

Obama wasn’t an executive

That one sentence proves my point. Thank you. I NEVER thought you would come to my defense on this primary. But you brought it to me with a silver bow. I appreciate it so much. Now if only I can get you on the Walker side. I still have a year.....

[Yardstick]

No, it proves my point, not yours. Obama has shown, once again, that an effective ideologue without executive experience can move the nation in the direction of his ideas. Isn’t that what we want to do? Isn’t that what Reagan did?

[2ndDivisionVet]

I don't think you “got” what he was saying. Mr. Obama didn't need a ton of executive experience to transform (very effectively, I might add) this country from what it was for over 200 years to what we have now. Now that may look like ineptitude or failure to you, but believe me, it's what he intended and the left likes what they see. He didn't need experience as a governor to radically alter this country and Ted Cruz won't need it to turn the ship around. Ted Cruz is, in reality, all the things the fawning press only claimed Mr. Obama was back before the election: The smartest man at Harvard Law, Editor of not just one law review, but four of them, a great debater, a once-in-a-generation mind, a catalyst for change, a philosophical giant and a charismatic speech maker. Mr. Obama needs a teleprompter to do what Ted Cruz can do extemporaneously.