Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: Pelham

“There’s no prohibition on Congress creating one”

Yes there is, actually. Please see Amendment the Tenth.

The fact that it was done is not proof that it was actually Constitutional.

L


16 posted on 02/05/2015 7:40:36 PM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Lurker

‘There’s no prohibition on Congress creating one’

“Yes there is, actually. Please see Amendment the Tenth.”

When Hamilton proposed the First Bank of the United States in 1790 both Jefferson and Madison argued that it was unConstitutional. Madison used the 10th Amendment argument.

Hamilton’s rebuttal included the argument that the government was sovereign and unless it was specifically prohibited it had the right to use various means to enable it to govern. The government already allowed persons to incorporate and it should allow “artificial persons”, corporations, to have the same rights. The First Bank was a private corporation, as all of our central banks have been.

President Washington weighed the arguments, decided the Bank Bill did not violate the Constitution, and signed it into law in February 1791. President Washington was aware of your argument. You lost.


21 posted on 02/05/2015 8:17:41 PM PST by Pelham (WWIII. Islam vs the West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson