[SoFloFreeper]

“I do think Bill Clinton, having served as a governor, I think that was better preparation for being president [than] simply being a senator, as we’ve seen with President Obama,” Jindal told reporters at the Christian Science Monitor breakfast in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday.

Bobby Jindal said this, and in fact he is correct.

Clinton was not a good president. He was a better occupant of the Oval Office than the current failure, however.

I think an objective study of the office over the past 100 years will reveal that governors, with some exceptions, generally make more effective Chief Executives.

[ladyjane]

governors, with some exceptions, generally make more effective Chief Executives.

Even Mormon governors? LOL

[Tucker39]

With the Republicans who were in office at that time riding herd on him legislatively....relatively speaking; if someone had regularly laced his Big Macs with salt petre, he might not have been too bad a president. (Spelling intentional, and correct).

[Still Thinking]

And Ebola, er Osama, er Obama wasn’t even a working Senator to any great extent. He was just the selectee checking the boxes before elevation to the ultimate office.