This is one of those issues which is a political looser for Republicans. It is politically wise to stay away from polarizing positions if you want to win elections. You don’t have to support something you believe is wrong and you don’t have to oppose it either - at least during an election. The way to improve any situation is to gain the power to influence that situation through legislation and court appointments and you can’t do that if you loose elections. Being rigid and self-righteous is a sure way to loose elections.
And once people realize you don't stand for anything at all, they'll be energized to come out and vote for you. Good thinking.
That is ridiculous, how do we choose a presidential candidate for instance, if we don’t know his views on the homosexual agenda?
every issue is polarized
You suggest a political party stand for nothing?
Cutting taxes - No position
Cutting spending -no position
Secure Borders - no position
Welfare reform - no position
Islamic terrorism - no position
I can see the voters lining up for that, not
“It is politically wise to stay away from polarizing positions if you want to win elections... The way to improve any situation is to gain the power to influence that situation through legislation and court appointments and you can’t do that if you loose elections.”
Then how do you know that you are electing an actual alternative?