Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The word “baptism” has long been used in a wide variety of contexts that have nothing to do with the Christian sacrament of baptism, and no one ever said that these usages were perverse or sacrilegious. For example, you might read about a soldier: “My baptism in combat occurred on just the third day of my tour, when we were ambushed by insurgents just outside of Fallujah.” Or in a football game you might hear: “Smith’s injury will bring in Jones, the redshirt Freshman quarterback who will have a baptism under fire here in the fourth quarter with the game on the line.”


30 posted on 04/28/2014 1:51:58 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Steve_Seattle
"Baptism of fire" is now an idiom fixed expression in English (and I guess that applies to phrases like "baptism in combat" now). You say it and very few people actually think of the Christian sacrament, any more than anyone expects it to be literally raining cats and dogs.

Associate baptism with water torture and some people will object. The direct association with the Christian sacrament hasn't been bleached out by its use in an idiomatic phrase.

Whether or not you get morally indignant about Palin's comment, the observation that her appearances have a collection of one-liners that aren't really to be taken seriously is something to consider.

And while the waterboarding comment wasn't the focus of her comments by any means, even bringing it up suggests that she's a bit out of touch with where the country is now. I doubt anybody's main concern today is with bringing back waterboarding (if it ever really went away).

64 posted on 04/28/2014 2:39:58 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson