Thanks, Harry, for admitting that the Tea Party is non-violent.
However, as an anarcho-capitalist myself, I can authoritatively say that most members of the Tea Party are decidedly not any sort of anarchists. Even the majority of libertarians are minarchists, not anarchists.
Thanks, Harry, for admitting that the Tea Party is non-violent.
However, as an anarcho-capitalist myself, I can authoritatively say that most members of the Tea Party are decidedly not any sort of anarchists. Even the majority of libertarians are minarchists, not anarchists.
Anarchist, as a named cause, have laid claim to the moniker.
Just as the classic liberal has been completely perverted.
If you want to call it “minarchist” that’s fine, however the fundamental basis for conservatism today is anarchy with guardrails.
The guardrails are the US Constitution.
The Tea Party just wants to be left alone. We want to be free from Gov’t, which can be interpreted as anarchy.
The difference of course is that the anarchist from the 1960’s and 70’s, can only define what they are against, not what they are for.
As a Tea party member, I can tell you what I am for.
This is a trailer for the movie “The Anarchist Cookbook”
Wild movie, and still one of my favorites.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znEEUSq71Eg