There is not one single shred of VIABLE, 3 party evidence from 2 separate threads running for over a week that supports the definition of natural born citizen as having FORIEGN PARENTS, Jeff.
Unless you want to try to warp the NATURALIZATION acts as to somehow making natural-born citizens.....again.
-----
Pure Alinsky - If you can't refute the facts, change the question.
One of the things that has constantly amazed me is the way that birthers constantly use the dirty, slimy tactics that they accuse others of.
Publicly accusing me and other genuinely careful interpreters of the Constitution of being "paid." Accusations of being a "troll." Accusations of being an "Obama supporter" or "Obot."
Twisting of quotes. Cherry picking of quotes. Misinterpretation of legal decisions - to the point where you insist that two sentences of side comment, which are completely irrelevant to the resolution of the case and are never referred to again (not once, let alone in the final summing-up) are "binding legal precedent," and yet dozens of pages of core rationale are "completely irrelevant" simply because the Justices didn't include the words "natural born" in their final summation of the decision.
The latter, by the way, is a totally blatant handling of the case you like in one way, and a handling of the case you don't like in the absolutely opposite way. It is hypocrisy and case-twisting at its very best.
Bald assertions that your evidence is great, and "no evidence" exists for the position you don't like, even though literally dozens of historical and legal quotes which you can't refute have been produced.
All very "Alinsky," or worse.
There is not one single shred of VIABLE, 3 party evidence from 2 separate threads running for over a week that supports the definition of natural born citizen as having FORIEGN PARENTS, Jeff.
Bull.
What you mean is there's not a single shred of evidence THAT YOU WILL ACCEPT. Now THAT would be an accurate statement.
There's more evidence than what I've produced so far. But what I've produced so far is enough to establish the point with any reasonably unbiased person.