You don’t have the credentials to understand what you are posting compared to true Constitutional Scholars like Dr. Herb Titus. Here is his credentials that solidify him as a true expert on the natural born Citizen subject.
Mr. Titus taught constitutional law, common law, and other subjects for nearly 30 years at five different American Bar Association approved law schools. From 1986 to 1993, he served as the founding Dean of the College of Law and Government in Regent University, Virginia Beach, Virginia. Prior to his academic career, he served as a Trial Attorney and a Special Assistant United States Attorney with the United States Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. and Kansas City, Missouri. Today he is engaged in a general practice with a concentration in constitutional strategy, litigation, and appeals.
Mr. Titus holds the J.D. degree (cum laude) from Harvard and the B.S. degree in Political Science from the University of Oregon from which he graduated Phi Beta Kappa. He is an active member of the bar of Virginia and an inactive member of the bar of Oregon. He is admitted to practice before the United States Supreme Court, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the United States Court of Claims, and the United States Courts of Appeals for the Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, Tenth, District of Columbia and Federal Circuits. His constitutional practice has taken him into federal district courts in Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Montana, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Texas, Wyoming, and the District of Columbia and the state courts of Idaho, Texas and North Dakota.
Ladies and gentlemen, take a look at these two graphs. It shows what a true Constitutional natural born Citizen is. Thanks.
http://blockyourid.com/~gbpprorg/obama/naturalbornchart07292009.jpg
That's your response? That's your response to the clear and historical evidence I presented as to what natural born citizen meant in early America, from the mouths of the greatest legal experts in history?
Your response is literally laughable, for a number of reasons. First, as already noted, Titus is NOTHING compared to the genuine experts I've cited. Second, Titus gives no argument or authority at all.
Here's your argument: Titus is a "Constitutional expert." We should believe him.
As many others have pointed out, equally valid is THIS argument: "Barack Obama is a 'Constitutional expert.' Therefore, we must believe him."
So your argument goes absolutely nowhere. Since Titus is virtually alone, in fact, with MANY more better qualified experts saying the OPPOSITE of what Titus says, the argument you are using, if anyone accepts it, ABSOLUTELY DISPROVES Titus.
So why do you make this idiotic argument? The reason is quite obvious: You're determined to believe Titus, no matter what. So you'll take whatever argument you can find, even if it quickly disproves you.
That's what it is to be a birther.
