Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet
This article is so dumb. Just dumb. Because it delves into personality politics -- and that's not our game. Conservatism wins everywhere it's tried -- to borrow a phrase.

"It was after Sarah Romney was chosen that things picked up, considerably. Massive crowds started showing up, volunteers showed up to man local GOP offices, and money came pouring in."

He had massive crowds, money, volunteers -- didn't make a whit of diff.

The game is now about Democrats having endless weeks on end to ship low-info voters to the polls. Period.

Fix that, and it's game on again...

67 posted on 12/29/2012 8:29:42 AM PST by StAnDeliver (Fiction is stranger than fiction...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: StAnDeliver

Romney’s crowds in 2012 were only a fraction of what Palin’s were in 2008.


69 posted on 12/29/2012 8:39:43 AM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: StAnDeliver

Dems were able to get low info voters because they appealed to their base. An excited base works harder to draw low info voters. Romney specifically worked against his base to go after the moderates and independents. According to Rush Limbaugh, the dems had already learned that was a losing strategy. They found that appealing to the base brought in more voters.

I guess now we know who was right.


129 posted on 12/31/2012 12:36:36 AM PST by Waryone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson