Did you miss the spectacle that was the 2011/2012 GOP nominating contest? It didn't happen. Some self-proclaimed conservatives hopped from one name to the next: Palin, Bachmann, Perry, Cain, Newt, Santorum... It was theater of the absurd.
As Donald Rumsfield said, "You go to war with the army you have---not the army you might want or wish to have at a later time."
Romney is that army against Obama. There is no savior on the sidelines, there is no 3rd party superstar that will topple everyone else. Those are pipe dreams.
It's simple: Romney or Obama.
I pray you and the other self-destructives are in uncontested states.
The time to hope Romney fails is if he makes bad policy proposals after Obama's tenure is in the history books.
As your litany points out, Romney is malleable meaning he can be moved right. Obama is a rigid, uncompromising imperialist ideologue.
If you think four more of Obama would be the shock required to get a conservative elected next time, you're a mental case.
As for your cutesy graphic, it tells me you are for Obama's cause. When the WA Post and Factcheck.org support Romney's version of his Bain activities, you can bet it's not a put-on.
As the Post pointed out, Democrats fought to keep Romney off the ballot when he ran for governor. MA Dems claimed he wasn't a resident; in fighting that case, Romney never once pointed to working at Bain as evidence that he in fact was still a resident. Now the Democrat party vehemently argues the other way.
...Romney is malleable meaning he can be moved right. Obama is a rigid, uncompromising imperialist ideologue.
Exactly!
Ø has to GO!
Mittens Stinks!
I'd rather we Tea Party Rally against Romney (once he gets in)- there's a fighting chance he'd listen and adjust.
Fighting Ø is Racist...blah, blah, blah...
(I Can't afford 4 more years of Ø. Many of US can't. If I had more money stashed away I'd say 'F' it and vote for Mickey Mouse and go Galt - I don't have that option right now ....the United States doesn't have that option right Now)