Right, four of years of a lame duck Democrat faced with growing conservative opposition in Congress is better than eight years of a liberal Republican or another Democrat with a shrinking minority of Republicans in Congress.
I'd love to see you tell why that isn't true.
It isn’t true because four more years of the current regime is not acceptable. Not in foreign policy or domestic policy. The primary goal of this election is the removal of this regime from power.
E.g., Obamacare is fait accompli unless action is taken by congress and signed by president. That isn’t going to happen if Obama is re-elected.
Now, again: why don’t you vote for Obama if his re-election is the better than Romney’s election in your opinion?