[Marguerite]

The hell with that. Paul’s supporters are a bunch of unwashed hooligans. “Constitutionalists”, my foot. Have you seen them? And Paul is an old clown.

[Marguerite]

“At every step, the Paul supporters were loud and disruptive. When arguing, they got out of the bleachers (we were in the gym of a highschool) went to the floor, and yelled in faces with fingers pointed. Even from the other side of the gym, I was intimidated. The most outspoken were in front of the bleachers acting as cheerleaders trying to get more people on their side.” - caucus-goer Rachel

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/missouri-caucus-anecdotes-arguments-arrests-and-a-good-

[Dead Corpse]

Paul is less electable than your average FReeper. I've run into Paul supporters from Top to Bottom though. From College kids to Grandparents.

Not all of them are whackadoos... Interesting how many of the whacky types end up in the MSM headlines though.

All that being said... The Party Chair ignored the rules. Period. Doesn't matter who it was. The calls for division of the en banc slate of Delegates were in their Rights under Roberts Rules. You can have a vote to table such a question indefinitely, but you cannot adjourn while the division is left unresolved.

[tacticalogic]

The hell with that. Paul’s supporters are a bunch of unwashed hooligans. “Constitutionalists”, my foot. Have you seen them? And Paul is an old clown.

Which of the other candidates and there supporters would you describe as representing the "Constitutionalists"?