Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Video: Sarah Palin Slams Mitt Romney's Win in Florida
Opposing Views ^ | January 31, 2012 | Michael Allen

Posted on 01/31/2012 10:18:19 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: Terry Mross; varina davis
The establishment has chosen the candidate. For years I thought someone else decided who was president. Then I fell for the Florida vote recount and got suckered back into the old “every vote counts” B.S. Now it’s being proven on a daily basis that someone selects the president. And it ain’t the voters. Anyone want to borrow some of my tin foil?

Wanna get really depressed? Read this book from '71.

None Dare Call It Conspiracy

On a separate note, when Reagan was nominated the RINOs were pushing the idea of a Co- Presidency with either Ford, Rockefeller or another one of their guys pulling the strings from behind the scenes. Reagan declined of course but chose Bush as running mate to appease them. Now where's that tin foil?

61 posted on 02/01/2012 4:38:17 AM PST by Jed Eckert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: CASchack
-- When one candidate has most of the money, establishment, and MSM behind him, the playing field isn't level. --

I also think that is what Palin was referring to, but even if primaries were held until the cows come home, there will not be a level playing field. The establishment and media will openly or "subtly" choose the candidates, then give the public its (the establishment's) choice.

62 posted on 02/01/2012 4:53:31 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Dadofmany

“She is just odd, why would anyone put her on their show?”

Because Sarah Palin has millions of supporters.


63 posted on 02/01/2012 5:54:39 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

-—And one more thing... to hell with Megan Kelly... she is all mouth, ears, teeth, hair and nothing in between-—

There isn’t much there there, and what little is there is liberal conventional wisdom. She’s dropped to Dana Perino level.


64 posted on 02/01/2012 6:00:14 AM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt

-—Something that would blow Mitt right out of the water would be for Newt and Sarah to hold a joint news conference and announce they are officially teaming with Palin as Newt’s VP. For the remainder of the Primaries it would be all Newt/Sarah.-—

Barring that, Newt has an uphill climb.

I’m disappointed in Sarah’s rationale for voting for Newt. Why should we keep the process going? Newt is far more articulate and, apparently, intelligent than Sarah, so I prefer her in the VP slot.


65 posted on 02/01/2012 6:19:36 AM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: hattend

-—Appearing on Fox News tonight, former half term Alaska Gov.——

I live in Massachusetts, and this infuriated me because Romney was AWOL during the last 1-2 years of his governorship, as he prepared to run for president. Massachusetts was effectively lacking a governor.

He gets a complete pass. At least Sarah left the governorship with a conservative successor in mind.


66 posted on 02/01/2012 6:35:02 AM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Sarah’s message of ‘allow the process to go on’ and ‘level the playing field’ is lost to many voters who form opinions only from the media and the ads they see.
Wish she will quit Fox news and outright say what she wants - vote for Gingrich the one who has proven to be the most conservative who can beat obama!
She knows money can buy votes. What she says occassionally will not drown out the brain-washing ‘message’ (the attack ads) that money can buy and get intended results. Plus for every word she utters, there are thousands counter words from the E and the lamestream!
Sarah needs to make her message clear! As the ‘palinized’ person she should understand what Gingrich is going through and she should take the war to them. Sarah, if you are serious, endorse Gingrich and stump with him!


67 posted on 02/01/2012 6:36:14 AM PST by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

That was a weak statement of support Sarah...but thanks for at least standing against the lies! Now team Newt needs to expose those lies about his “fines” and quitting in “disgrace”. Let’s roll!


68 posted on 02/01/2012 6:40:16 AM PST by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo with laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: varina davis
Probably some looney lib made a death threat. It seems to be all the rage these days, look at Sheriff Joe.
69 posted on 02/01/2012 6:40:47 AM PST by liberalh8ter (I don't like what the world has become....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: srmorton

Thanks very much but I’ve already heard him say he will vote for him if he’s the nominee, so I’ll stick with my opinion that he’s keeping Santorum alive to split the vote.


70 posted on 02/01/2012 7:12:28 AM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
WOO-HOO!

71 posted on 02/01/2012 7:13:45 AM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt; 2ndDivisionVet; onyx

For the remainder of the Primaries it would be all Newt/Sarah.
*************

Actually, I don’t believe that would be a good GOP team in the general election.

Now, on the other hand, if the GOP-E gets its puppet nominated, I’d be all in for that ticket on a 3rd party run.

Also, I think Sarah has to get off the fence. As she knows, this process is not about Newt- it’s an attack on the conservative grassroots base-—her base. She can’t allow it to be steamrolled and marginalized to the point that it is no longer considered a threat to the establishment.


72 posted on 02/01/2012 7:36:01 AM PST by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

I agree, I don’t think she knows how a sentence will end when she starts one. And, I couldn’t figure out how her opening remarks squared with her “keeping the process going” comments.

Plus - maybe it was the lighting - but that was the least attractive I have seen her. It was like she aged considerably (not that an older lady can’t be attractive, mind you).


73 posted on 02/01/2012 7:48:27 AM PST by Lando Lincoln (But that's just me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

It would mean no clear winner and a brokered convention.


74 posted on 02/01/2012 8:05:08 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

How she looks is a lot less important than what she says and how she feels. If she weren’t such a public figure what she says wouldn’t matter either.

We are in for flaming or zots for having dared to be the least bit critical of Sarah Palin.


75 posted on 02/01/2012 8:40:40 AM PST by Sequoyah101 (Half the people are below average.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

January 31, 2012
Women abandon Gingrich this time, by 22-point margin

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/31/women-abandon-gingrich-this-time-by-22-point-margin/#ixzz1l9RrJzoP


76 posted on 02/01/2012 9:29:24 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101
We are in for flaming or zots for having dared to be the least bit critical of Sarah Palin.

Playing the victim card is manipulation - a liberal tactic.

77 posted on 02/01/2012 9:29:28 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
Women abandon Gingrich this time, by 22-point margin...

The girls sure love their 'Slick Willie'...just like the FIRST time...

78 posted on 02/01/2012 9:31:02 AM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I agree. And they aren’t subtle about it. Not sure why others can’t connect the dots for they are big enough to see. Perhaps too embarrassed to admit they are being screwed with.


79 posted on 02/01/2012 9:43:29 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

“level the playing field”

Leveling the playing field is a socialist idea.

They should be the best they can be and aim for the top.

Well life is not fair and people do not have equal abilities in all areas. Each candidate should use his/her comparative advantage. This is a competition. People should vote for the candidate who they like the most and not just to level the playing field. It is like an employer who hires the best guy he can get for the job. The person may not be perfect person. Nobody is perfect.

If Palin thinks she could do a better job, she should run. She was capable of running a campaign, but I think she blew it when she declined.


80 posted on 02/01/2012 9:49:49 AM PST by moviefan8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson