So now you've dropped the futile effort to support Santorum's stupid comments? Smart move.
Glad you agree there's a laundry list of reasons not to support him--welcome to sanity! ;)
Interesting how you can't defend Santorum in these points, so you just attack Newt. 1. That's called dodging--"Well, this person might have cheated/stolen/whatever, but so did THAT person!" It doesn't change the facts. 2. You assume I support Newt, which I don't, so it's rather pointless.
But your maneuver sure shows what an awful 'conservative" Santorum is, and some of the reasons why I won't support him.
You’ve clearly conceded that he was correct in his statement by moving down to the next tier - laundry list of why Santorum is wrong and completely unrelated to the initial topic.
“Interesting how you can’t defend Santorum in these points”
Interesting how you attack SANTORUM for doing what Newt did, and give Newt a ‘get out of jail free card.’ Hey, if you’re going to call out Santorum for shovelling earmarks, you might want to give the emperor of earmarks some guff as well.
As it is, it appears to me that you’re cutting and pasting attacks against Santorum. How compelling is this? I might as well be arguing with the person who came up with this stuff (Club for Growth btw), instead of you.
“2. You assume I support Newt, which I don’t, so it’s rather pointless.”
Ahh. Paulbot. Hello sir!