Palin understands Newt’s populist anti-Romney crusade

The Daily Caller ^ | January 10, 2012 | Jeff Poor

[ReneeLynn]

And Sarah knows about the attack machine.

[CainConservative]

“I think he’s [Paul’s] going to shift a little bit of the debate going forward in the next couple of days, away from sort of an anti-capitalist mantra that we’ve been hearing the last two days into what it is the GOP really represents with free markets.”

Say what, Sarahcuda?

[2007 Crusader]

newt is dragging Palin down with him into oblivion.

[mylife]

“This isn’t bean bag,”

Newts exact words about attacking Newt in Iowa.

[HANG THE EXPENSE]

But everybody said Newt was mean and angry.I love mean and angry.

[txhurl]

Sarah’s going Paul on us?

[mylife]

Sometimes I think the entire party has gone Paul on us.

[HANG THE EXPENSE]

You’re wrong.It will be romney dragging us down a rathole.The only difference between romey and obama is skin pigment and that is it.

[txhurl]

Well, then let’s just all buy each other artisan glass-swirled pipes for our weed and be done with this ridiculous United States Experiment.

I, for one, have the perfect locale for doing nothing but getting high and penciling in Occupy parties for the next four years.

HURL! HURL!

[txhurl]

“I think he’s [Paul] going to shift a little bit of the debate going forward in the next couple of days, away from sort of an anti-capitalist mantra that we’ve been hearing the last two days into what it is the GOP really represents with free markets.”

This is a clear mowdown of both Newt and Perry.

[mylife]

Or she just thinks Paul will become a diversion from that firestorm.

I babble talk.

[mylife]

Where is this utopia?

LOL

[txhurl]

Judge Napolitano endorsed with bells on Ron Paul on Jon Stewart tonight.

[mylife]

Bizzare.

[mylife]

It’s babble talk.

[Lazlo in PA]

I get the impression she is either slamming Newt or telling him to tone it down with the economic attack on Mittens. She says she understands Newts position, but the section about how Paul is going to focus things back on track tells me she thinks things are off track now.

[mylife]

I would agree with that, and I predict Newt will reign it in while Perry doubles down

Leaving Perry holding the bag for attacks Newt originated.

We shall see.

[vaudine]

I am in the dark here about takeovers when the company doesn't want to be taken over. I am totally in favor of free markets and capitalism in so far as I understand them; however, not being a financial guru, I have been troubled in the past 2 or 3 decades about hostile takeovers. How are they any different from the govt. swooping down and taking over? Shouldn't the owners/investors be able to decide whether or not to sell, restructure, etc.?

Anyone who understands how hostile takeovers work, please explain. Also, do you know if Bain was into hostile takeovers. I think probably so--at least some.

Mitt isn't it for me, and not for his money and flip flops, either. He just comes across as passionless, uncommitted, and awkward. I also resent his being pushed by Rove, Foxers, Coulter, etc. On the other hand, Paul could NOT win. He comes across whiney and looney in spite of his fiscal frugality--Kucinich??? Looney!.

vaudine

[patriot08]

It’ll take mean and angry to defeat the Marxist/Muslim.
Newt’s right. The others are too timid.