Cain does not understand the constitutional struggle deep enough to protect the constitution. I am not impressed with the advisors he’s gathered around him either.
He’s a very nice man. He’s a sucessful man in business. We need someone who has fought socialists for a long enough time to get us out from under the animals currently in power.
Newt or Perry, in my opinion. They are both flawed but they are not as bad as Romney and they know more about what we are facing than does Cain.
What constitutional struggle are you talking about? What specifically does he NOT understand?
A successful businessman hasn’t fought socialism via his participation in the private sector?
So you happen to have greater knowledge on the constitution that he has? You’ve seen him grilled on every single part of the constitution? He has LESS than a layman’s knowledge?
Again, does that mean a citizen shouldn’t run (or win) because they have the same love and appreciation that we do but not some encyclopedic knowledge? Guess that pretty much answers my question about whether you think the founders were incorrect to NOT put qualifiers on who they thought would make a good president.
Maybe the next president who is a member of the permanent political class should work on passing an amendment forbidding anyone without X number of years in government to be elected president.
Yes, he’s got some learning to do as far as campaign staff but this isn’t the only time he’s ever in his life had to surround himself with competent people. How is it possible to turn companies around as he did if he was incapable of choosing good people. He recently hired the BEST attorney one could ever hire to deal with his charges. I haven’t seen whats-his-face in public since his ridiculous accusations.
Cindie