To: rob777
Even the Democrat party blamed her for stopping the bridge, the bridge was stopped only months into her administration, as far as earmarks see post 97.
110 posted on
07/11/2011 8:00:55 PM PDT by
ansel12
(America has close to India population of 1950s, India has 1,200,000,000 people now. Quality of Life?)
To: ansel12
"...the bridge was stopped only months into her administration..."
It was still stopped AFTER the outcry had arisen and the funding for it came up short due to a reaction to that outcry from Congress. Alaska did not return the funds that were allocated, but used them elsewhere. There is no getting around the fact that Sarah was an enthusiastic supporter of the project and only killed it when the funds came up short. To spin this as a heroic act of fiscal prudence is pushing the envelope.
115 posted on
07/12/2011 8:21:38 AM PDT by
rob777
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson