Well, lets just attack and denounce and ridicule anyone who has even some good conservative credentials and for the most part does a good job in his pundatry...
these kind of comments are so like the Libs...”they eat their own too..”
“Well, lets just attack and denounce and ridicule anyone who has even some good conservative credentials and for the most part does a good job in his pundatry...”
That’s the MO of some hereon. I often disagree with CK’s positions but it looks foolish trying to paint him as a dummy because he chose to go into psychiatry instead of cardiology (of course it’s really because he doesn’t like Sarah’s chances - if he did he’d be the greatest doc since Albert Schweitzer).
Who made him so important, anyway? What does he do except feather his own "intelligentsia" nest? Why do you seem to think I owe him some sort of loyalty? I see him taking absolutely no risks for conservatism.
And I'd like to know how he got into medical school in the US with a liberal arts degree and Canadian citizenship. If you knew a little bit about how competitive med schools were when Kraut got in, you might be a little curious yourself.
Krauthammer is a stealth communist, just following the Gramscian "long march through the institutions" directive. And he is certainly not the only one.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer
In 1978, Krauthammer quit medical practice to direct planning in psychiatric research for the Jimmy Carter administration, and began contributing to The New Republic magazine. During the presidential campaign of 1980, Krauthammer served as a speech writer to Vice President Walter Mondale.
Cultural hegemony is the philosophic and sociological concept, originated by the Marxist philosopher Antonio Gramsci, that a culturally-diverse society can be ruled or dominated by one of its social classes. It is the dominance of one social group over another, e.g. the ruling class over all other classes. The theory claims that the ideas of the ruling class come to be seen as the norm; they are seen as universal ideologies, perceived to benefit everyone whilst only really benefiting the ruling class.