What Gator said was, “Some of these PDS folks better start to come around or pack up.”
What you responded with was, “I am utterly astounded that there are so many people like you who think anyone who doubts Palin can get elected is a “RINO”. “
But that isn’t what he said. You’re engaging in mind reading, a fallacy. How do you know what he thinks, especially if you don’t appear to be directly apprehending what he wrote? If you’re a PDSer, you deserve what he says. If you ain’t, then what’s the problem? If you doubt Palin’s electability, then state your case and present someone else who’s a more conservative candidate with better name recognition.
But before you do, why don’t you walk through JimRob’s definition of conservative (highlighted on the main page in red lettering) to see if it applies to you, or if you’re just a RINO...
One more time: FR’s God-given Life & Liberty constitutional conservative activism agenda!!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2627159/posts
In response to GOP Proud (Queer eye and RINO guy for the TPP) ^ | Nov 14, 2010 | Jim Robinson
Posted on Sunday, November 14, 2010 5:13:16 PM by Jim Robinson
A person can agree to the strictist definition of a conservative, AND STILL not believe that a true conservative can get elected. You are correct, I don’t know what anyone else thinks, but there are thousands of posts which loudly label people RINOs, just because a slight doubt has been expressed as to Palin’s electibility. I am a conservative, and I should not have to defend that fact because I read some tea leaves a little different than someone else.