Replies

Thompson-Romney would be good. It could well beat any Dem ticket. Plus it gives Romney 4-8 years to groom and learn. I also like Thompson-Hunter. Both IMHO would beat a Hillary-Obama ticket or any other Dem ticket. Thompson-Hunter or Thompson-Romney would put strong leadership at the top and guidance throughout the chain.

I think Hunter in the Senate as VP would be better than an old fashioned bull whip. I can even say that Hunter as SECHLS or SECDEF would be excellent too.

I don't know that I would deem Rudy SECSTATE material - might be another Albright. Possibly AG if he is still as tenacious as he was years ago. Romney would make a better SECSTATE than Rudy. Romney might even be good as SECTREAS or SECCOMMERCE.

I could even see Huckabee as SECHHS, SECLABOR, SECHUD or SECINTERIOR. SECVA maybe Gen Pace. Most of the other GOP Presidential candidates I have no use for. Tancredo is still needed in House, especislly if Hunter not there. I believe some Senators would be good in cabinet positions (Sessions, Cornyn, Inhofe, Coburn, Dole) but then take them from the Senate and it could be a body without a conscience. Others like McConnell, McCain, Kyl, Gramham and Lott might need to go home and set out a while - a long while.

This 'go along to get along' with the Dems attitude that seems to have infected the GOP Senators needs to be excised and quarantined. Our House Republican need to start speaking up more also, not just Tancredo.

Well, you can’t have Inhofe or Coburn. We need them to much. I could go for a Thompson-Romney OR a Thompson-Giuliani ticket, if I had to. I think Rudy or Romney would be an asset in the Senate. Hunter would be great, but I don’t think he’s a chance. Not enough folks here in the center of the country know him.

I, also, think either of the above named Republican tickets would beat Hillary/Obama, or whatever the final dim Dem nominee configuration might be.