[cinFLA]

You are correct - unfortunately the anti-smoker cartel refuses to acknowledge that FACT of epidemiology and statistics.

If y'all are going to talk statistics, you should at least be correct. The size of the RR factor has NO impact on its statistical relevance. Please go do your homework.

[Gabz]

The size of the RR factor has NO impact on its statistical relevance.

Actually it does...if the RR straddles parity (1.00) it is statistically insignificant

And since you are talking about being correct, please explain your comment that cigarettes emit enough CO to set off CO moniotrs.