Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: William Terrell
Risk factors below 3 are not statistically relevant, which means the risk link can't be established.

A relative risk factor of 3 means that the event is 3 times more likely to occur. The difference between putting one bullet in a gun vs. three bullets. Would you consider it statistically relevant to have three vs. one bullets in a gun when playing russian roulette? I think most reasonable people would say there was.

177 posted on 07/02/2004 9:56:40 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]


To: cinFLA
A relative risk factor of 3 means that the event is 3 times more likely to occur.

No, it means that, at a risk factor of 3, you can begin to think there is a link, since a risk factor of 1 means there is no significance at all.

The statistical methods use say that "A Relative risk of 1.0 indicates no effect." "No" in this case means 0. 0x3=0.

183 posted on 07/02/2004 10:27:24 AM PDT by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson