To: new cruelty
It's not like the French helped us out of the kindness of their hearts, but rather out of a desire to stick it to the british. Regardless, our debt was more than repaid by WW1, let alone WW2.
5 posted on
09/07/2003 6:50:31 AM PDT by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: Rodney King; CIB-173RDABN; bert; auntdot; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; the gillman@blacklagoon.com
Absolutely.
And absent the French Revolution and Napoleon, a French Monarchy in the early 1800s would be looking to expand its New World domain rather conquer Europe.
And it wouldn't really care if the Anglo territories were ruled from London or Washington
37 posted on
09/07/2003 8:03:08 AM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
("Pillage, THEN Burn")
To: Rodney King
It's not like the French helped us out of the kindness of their hearts, but rather out of a desire to stick it to the British.True, but getting involved in our Revolution probably cost Louis his throne. It screwed up his finances to the point where he had to call the Estates General to get more money, and it spread revolutionary ideas. And the revolution that resulted plunged France into chaos and misery (offset for some people by Napoleonic gloire, but devastating to many more). The old saying that "no good deed goes unpunished" probably explains a lot about Franco-American relations -- on both sides.
71 posted on
09/07/2003 12:58:37 PM PDT by
x
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson