Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vindiciae Contra TyrannoSCOTUS
IMO, marriage is to benefit future generations (the children), not to provide some goodie grab bag for the married partners. This should be kept in mind when deciding what tax and other benefits accrue to families.
3 posted on 08/05/2003 3:24:00 PM PDT by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Post Toasties
IMO, marriage is to benefit future generations (the children), not to provide some goodie grab bag for the married partners. This should be kept in mind when deciding what tax and other benefits accrue to families.

That was the original notion behind giving different tax treatment to married couples than to singles as well as having employers include spouses and children in group insurance coverages.

In this respect, polgamy and polyandry are, unlike same sex unions, at least still founded on begetting and raising children. Many cultures in many times and places have or do practice polygamy. I know of none that did so before the last few decades anywhere. Oh there was homosexuality and even legally and socially condoned and/or incouraged homosexuality, but AFAIK, not homosexual marriage.

35 posted on 08/05/2003 7:34:16 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson