[GovernmentShrinker]

It's worrisome how much time and energy conservatives are wasting on this tiny little school which has been around for 20 years. Sure it's being expanded now -- to accommodate a whopping 100 students in a city school system with an enrollment of over 1 million. These are troubled kids for whom the alternative to this school is almost certainly out on the streets turning tricks and doing drugs. Their parents are either MIA or support the choice of school, since there's no way any kid is being enrolled in this school over parents' objections. Ignore it and move on!

[First Amendment]

Their parents are either MIA or support the choice of school, since there's no way any kid is being enrolled in this school over parents' objections. Ignore it and move on!

Blows my mind that you can say this in the face of this being a "model school" that other communities are supposed to emulate. This is like a flagship for others to follow. You call yourself a "government shrinker" so how can you possibly justify squandering TAXPAYER money on this horror?

[kuma]

Cause now their using taxpayer money and so it's our business.

[alnick]

to accommodate a whopping 100 students in a city school system with an enrollment of over 1 million

So it's okay to sacrifice only 100 kids on the altar of political correctness, huh? This is only the beginning. The goal is to have "gay school" all across the country.

These are children. The school has no business encouraging these kids to be sexual.

[JesseHousman]

Ignore it and move on!

That statement sounds like it came from a person who doesn't care about taxpayers footing the bill for perversity.

Government Shrinker, indeed!

[luckystarmom]

Why do they have to call it a gay school?

"These are troubled kids for whom the alternative to this school is almost certainly out on the streets turning tricks and doing drugs"

Why not call it a school for troubled kids, and not label these kids gay?