To: lowbridge
For me this sets the following precedent: if you profess a belief in (a) God, you are ineligible for any govt benefits.
Have I got this right?
hmmmmmm
Godspeed
14 posted on
07/31/2003 11:51:50 PM PDT by
America's Resolve
("We have prepared for the unbelievers, whips and chains and blazing fires!" Koran 76:4)
To: America's Resolve
"For me this sets the following precedent: if you profess a belief in (a) God, you are ineligible for any govt benefits." I was thinking the same thing.
It sounds like our courts want it so that people who believe in God can't have anything to do with the government, and the government can't have anything to do with people who believe in God.
I believe in God.
Does that mean I don't have to pay taxes to the government anymore? Separation of church and state you know.
To: America's Resolve
For me this sets the following precedent: if you profess a belief in (a) God, you are ineligible for any govt benefits. Hmmmmmmm! I guess I like it!
33 posted on
08/01/2003 1:18:26 AM PDT by
Smile-n-Win
(Just government means organized self-defense. A "compassionate" government is organized crime.)
To: America's Resolve
For me this sets the following precedent: if you profess a belief in (a) God, you are ineligible for any govt benefits.
or, in this case, to do business with your own government.
150 posted on
08/02/2003 11:37:05 AM PDT by
gitmo
(We have left the slippery slope and we are now in free fall.)
To: America's Resolve
Well, using this logic, if a legal entity were to have a belief in a G-d like figure, and profess it, then they would be denied any governmental contracts.
Therefore, a Christian could be denied a drivers license if they have any indication of their faith displayed on their vehicle.
152 posted on
08/02/2003 12:25:07 PM PDT by
sten
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson