Thanks for a great, in depth article that proves, once again, if ya wanna have a lousy life and die young, be a queer."According to William Dellenback, the institute's photographer, Kinsey was becoming overtly exhibitionist-to the point of having himself filmed, always from the chest down, while engaged in masochistic masturbation. The world's foremost expert on sexual behavior would insert an object such as a pipe cleaner or swizzle stick into his urethra, tie a rope around his scrotum and then tug hard on the rope...
"Toward the end of his life, Kinsey's boundaries shifted again-to the point where he was apparently prepared to withhold moral disapproval of adult-child sexual contacts....
Then, in 1973, in a dramatic reversal, the American Psychiatric Association removed homosexuality from its list of psychopathologies. Kinsey, the anguished man of science, had prevailed." (Voices From the Past section, pages 894-898, quoted from New Yorker magazine article "Annals of Sexology: Dr.Yes," New Yorker, September 1, 1997, page 113).
LAWRENCE et al. v. TEXAS - Scalia
States continue to prosecute all sorts of crimes by adults "in matters pertaining to sex": prostitution, adult incest, adultery, obscenity, and child pornography. Sodomy laws, too, have been enforced "in the past half century," in which there have been 134 reported cases involving prosecutions for consensual, adult, homosexual sodomy. Gaylaw 375. In relying, for evidence of an "emerging recognition," upon the American Law Institute’s 1955 recommendation not to criminalize " ‘consensual sexual relations conducted in private,’ " ante, at 11, the Court ignores the fact that this recommendation was "a point of resistance in most of the states that considered adopting the Model Penal Code." Gaylaw 159.
Today's opinion is the product of a Court, which is the product of a law-profession culture, that has largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda, by which I mean the agenda promoted by some homosexual activists directed at eliminating the moral opprobrium that has traditionally attached to homosexual conduct.
The New American - Fighting the Kinsey Fraud - May 24, 1999
Q. One of your important discoveries is the connection between the Kinsey cabal and the American Law Institute (ALI) — the "educational arm" of the American Bar Association — and ALI’s adoption of the Model Penal Code in 1955 to alter the sex crime laws and family laws of America, both nationally and state by state. Explain this nexus and its significance.
A. My chapter on Kinsey’s impact on American law provides evidence of the deceitful coordination and collaboration between Kinsey and key members of the ALI to overthrow the Common Law, biblical, and constitutional underpinnings of the legal protections provided against sexual predators. The ALI’s chief author of the Model Penal Code was Professor Herbert Wechsler, acclaimed legal scholar at Columbia University and formerly a confidential assistant to President Franklin Roosevelt. Wechsler launched the Kinsey/ALI crusade with an article in the May 1952 Harvard Law Review entitled "The Challenge of a Model Penal Code." Three years later, the ALI’s Model Penal Code was sent to state legislatures and our society’s legal protections began to crumble under a coordinated assault.
Kinsey’s network included New York Judge Morris Ploscowe, who published Sexual Patterns and the Law in 1951; journalist Albert Deutsch, who published Sex Habits of American Men in 1948; the notorious French pedophile and jurist Rene Guyon, who wrote The Ethics of Sexual Acts in 1948; and Morris Ernst and David Loth, who co-authored American Sexual Behavior and the Kinsey Report in 1948. Dr. Manfred Guttmacher and Dr. Harry Benjamin were also part of the Kinsey cabal.
This cadre of "experts" had a very well-oiled propaganda apparatus in the sympathetic national media, which accepted and promoted the Kinseyan legal and scientific claims without question. Kinsey was on the cover of most of our magazines and was celebrated in newspaper headlines and television news stories as a great scientist who was freeing the world from our unhealthy, puritanical sex repressions.
Q. The Kinsey/ALI cadre had a "hit list" of 52 crimes and legal subjects that they targeted for radical revision.
A. Yes, they intended to topple, or greatly weaken, laws concerning rape, statutory rape, seduction, prostitution, sodomy, bestiality, indecent exposure, incest, bigamy, nudity, obscenity, adultery, fornication, adult-child sex, illicit cohabitation, pornography, smoking opium and other narcotics, etc. Fully 100 percent of the Code’s citations addressing empirically any American data for sex behavior refer to Kinsey’s false research. The effects have been calamitous.
Prior to Kinsey, rape was treated as a heinous crime in keeping with the Common Law standard. If convicted, rapists faced mandatory execution in three states, the possibility of a death penalty in 20 states, and a minimum of a 20-year sentence in all but one of the states. Kinsey changed all that.
Now the most vulnerable of society — women and children — are victimized twice: once by sexual crimes and vice, and again by the changed laws that refuse to penalize the perpetrator. This is Kinsey’s legacy, which is anti-marriage, anti-father, anti-mother, and, most definitely, anti-child.
Nowhere did the authors cite the scientific evidence which has concluded that homosexuality is neither innate nor immutable. Nowhere did the authors note that homosexual men and women have choices in how they respond to their attractions. In no case did they even offer the view that homosexuality represents an adaptation--not an identity--and that homosexual attractions are more fluid than once thought.
Most importantly, the preoccupation of many of the authors with "homophobia" allows little room to adequately consider other hypotheses. Perhaps it is not homophobia but misguided activism that is responsible for the current health problems that plague homosexual individuals.
Dutch society is recognized as one of the most gay-affirming and gay-tolerant in the world, and yet the risk for mental illness among those who engage in homosexuality remains high, and significantly higher than among heterosexuals in that country.
Regarding physical health, there is increasing evidence that mortality and morbidity rates are substantially higher for those who engage in homosexual practices. For example, the risk of anal cancer soars by as much as 4,000% for men who engage in anal intercourse with other men. The host of medical consequences of those who practice anal intercourse is large, from the tearing of the rectal lining with all of its accompanying problems to the diseases associated with subsequent contact with fecal matter.
................anti-marriage,
..................anti-father,
.................anti-mother,
............and, most definitely,
...................anti-child."
Bump!
A gift that keeps on giving? Twisted thinking for sure.
Idolators of perversion. They define their connection with some sort of divinity as being a deadly disease of mind and body shared between them.
A man and a woman producing children have a sense of immortality through their offspring. Is this disease their vile sense of what it is to give birth?
Thanks for a great, in depth article that proves, once again, if ya wanna have a lousy life and die young, be a queer.Anyone know what the h**l this is supposed to mean? It really sounds to me as though this man has lost his sanity - but kept talking. Babbling, his thought processes divorced from reality.