[Dudoight]

I see your point. It had to be a tough case for the judge. It was apparent that Michael was the most stable/nurturing parent, psychologically. Traditionally, the mother, especially since she was not a transgendered individual....would get the kids. However, a point that no one confronted was the fact that the mother must have been somewhat of a lesbian to marry a man who was pretty much physically a woman.

[hellinahandcart]

It had to be a tough case for the judge

Yes, it was probably very difficult to find just the right words to make his social experimentation sound reasonable. That's why he went on for 800 pages about it.It was apparent that Michael was the most stable/nurturing parent, psychologically

Yes, especially after the natural mother became a Christian and realized that, no matter how you slice it, she was living in a lesbian relationship with a freak.

Can't possibly have the children raised around that kind of bigotry, can we? It's just not healthy.

[hellinahandcart]

How do you justify the fact that this judged ruled that the freak could adopt those kids only this past February? While the freak and his wife were divorcing? Against the mother's wishes, get it?

She's trying to get rid of the "man", and the judge says "No problem, you can just adopt the kids now, after you've been separated from their mother for five years, and I'll give you custody"? WTF?