Maybe you have an aversion to logic, or maybe just to the obvious, but if the law defines marriage in a way that precludes gay marriage, there is a law against gay marriage.
I'm simply bewildered that that even needs to be explained.
Maybe you have an aversion to logic, or maybe just to the obvious, but if the law defines marriage in a way that precludes gay marriage, there is a law against gay marriage.You are the one with logic problems.
Following your logic, are you saying that there is a law against me collecting veterans benefits?
I've never served in the military, and I'm probably to old to serve now. Since the law defines veterans in a way that precludes me from being a veteran, there is a law against me collecting veterans benefits. That's not fair. We should change the law so that anyone can be a veteran, regardless of military service.
There is no reason that gays can't get married. However, if it isn't a man and a woman, it's not a marriage. How difficult is that to understand?