[ShandaLear]

I couldn't disagree more. The court in this country exists to interpret the law. The Supreme Court exists to measure the law against the constituton. And yes, I was joking.

[Eastbound]

"The court in this country exists to interpret the law."

Well, of course. They must do that in order to fulfill the requirements of the law, which is to determine guilt or innocence and provide for punishment for offenders. Isn't that promoting the idea that there is a right and wrong, and that there is accountability for doing wrong? I believe that was my point. Do you disagree with that?