Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/06/2003 10:57:14 AM PDT by suspects
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: *puff_list
.
2 posted on 07/06/2003 11:02:49 AM PDT by Vigilantcitizen (game on in 10 seconds....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects
Has anyone seen "The Insider"? I heard it stunk so I never rented it.
4 posted on 07/06/2003 11:11:23 AM PDT by AF68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects
''He's right: You smoke, you die. That's pretty simple,''

And if you don't smoke..?

5 posted on 07/06/2003 11:16:57 AM PDT by jodorowsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects
'I think the way it was done stunk,'' he said. ''Tell me what a committee of 25 is going to do. Give me a break. I don't know a committee of five that can get anything done.

HEHE...... That was the point, I am sure.

7 posted on 07/06/2003 11:18:34 AM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects
You smoke, you die. That's pretty simple,''

Guess what Todd, if you don't smoke, you die.

9 posted on 07/06/2003 11:20:14 AM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects
I went to Google to look for a photo, and you can't believe how many "fan clubs" Wigand has! LOL!


10 posted on 07/06/2003 11:25:00 AM PDT by EggsAckley ( "Aspire to mediocracy"................new motto for publik skools.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects
The people so bent on outlawing cigarette smoking are the same ones trying to legalize marijuana smoking. Go figure the tyrannical liberals!
11 posted on 07/06/2003 11:25:34 AM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects
The famed tobacco whistle-blower detects a whiff of smoke on a visiting photographer and holds out his hand. He gets them, a pack of Salems. They are ''a donation,'' destined for the trash can in Wigand's oceanfront condominium.

The photographer wasn't smoking at the time, and he let's this guy confiscate his cigarettes like a Dutch uncle? I wouldn't have... Oh yeah, I've seen his picture, and he's no Russel Crowe.
12 posted on 07/06/2003 11:38:26 AM PDT by Welsh Rabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects
Nothing is worse than a non-smoking smoker. This guy is just *dying* for a cigarette, and because he won't allow himself the pleasure, he wants to make sure no one else is allowed to seek satisfaction. I've seen this bit of theatre played out hundreds of times. Sanctimonious hipocrits, all of 'em.
14 posted on 07/06/2003 11:39:26 AM PDT by whereasandsoforth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects
''He's right: You smoke, you die. That's pretty simple,'' Todd said.

Wonder if Mr. Todd ever took a high school biology class. Actually, everyone who lives eventually dies. I guess he slept through that chapter.

There are people I have known that smoked well into their 80's. There have been young people who died of heart problems and cancer that never smoked. Life's a crapp shoot. But definitely you will die.

19 posted on 07/06/2003 2:18:54 PM PDT by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects
''He's right: You smoke, you die. That's pretty simple,'' Todd said. ''He doesn't see anything in gray; he sees everything in black and white. If this thing passes, he will totally be the reason why.''

Wigand, too will die; my wife's cousin never smoked a single cigarette or a single cigar nor did he drink beer, whiskey or wine.

He worked hard all of his 45 years and just laid down one day and died.

Don't these people understand that life is a zero-sum game?

25 posted on 07/06/2003 6:31:29 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects
''He's right: You smoke, you die. That's pretty simple,'' Todd said.

It's also demonstrably false. Smoking increases your chances of developing certain heart and/or lung diseases. It doesn't guarantee you'll develop them.

It's also a misdirected argument - a straw man. There are NO valid studies which prove secondhand smoke is harmful. There are plenty that say it isn't. And that's what this supposed ordinance addresses.

It addresses it on the basis of hysteria, junk science, lies, and contempt for property rights.

Fork the smoking nazis.

33 posted on 07/07/2003 10:48:50 AM PDT by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson