Posted on 07/01/2003 11:36:14 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
Edited on 04/12/2004 5:52:11 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
That's what they all say. What a crock of s**t. Once a tax and spend liberal, always a tax and spend liberal.
It's probably true because it's a relatively small number. You notice she doesn't mention the real reason for the shortfall, or where the expenditures really go: K-8 schools and medical care.
At $10/hr (which would be a high wage), the great unmentionables would avg $20k/year. Since they seem to have around 4 kids apiece, and at an avg cost of $6k/year to edumicate them, we're already upside down to the tune of $4k/family if the entire $20k was paid-in as taxes. In reality, of course, they pay little if no tax, and receive a hugely disporportionate share of benefits.
Not surprising.
Although almost 30% of California's total population, 38% of it's K-12 school population and 45% of it's criminal population is a consequence of 50 years of illegal immigration (the vast majority from Mexico) there is little than can be practically done about the immediate problem since the vast majority of these people are now US citizens.
Darn, I was just about to email her this entire thread as a response to how her position is "playing" out there.
Anybody know how many State legislators are up for reelection in 04? We should get people to run against these idiots informed with the details of our friend Tom McClintock, I think candidates that illustrate his fiscal points can beat any of these clueless Democrates. Hell, WE could run.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.