Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sabertooth
Well, I tried to get that across, but missed it a bit I guess. What I meant to say is that you don't think they should have the tool, and not only that, but if they do have the tool, they won't be fashioning something as aesthetically pleasing as the Statue of David.
317 posted on 06/28/2003 12:07:04 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies ]


To: Torie
Exhibit 1:

Michelangelo's David.

Exhibit 2:

FReeper's version of Michelangelo's David


321 posted on 06/28/2003 12:12:05 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Cuba serĂ¡ libre...soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]

To: Torie
What I meant to say is that you don't think they should have the tool, and not only that, but if they do have the tool, they won't be fashioning something as aesthetically pleasing as the Statue of David.

That's my opinion, yes, and it's been my impression, based on your posts, that it is yours as well, even though we disagree on the particulars of where the SCOTUS will prove to be unwise in future rulings. Do I have that accurately?


336 posted on 06/28/2003 12:25:46 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson