[tdadams]

As Bowers shows, the Supreme Court was initially unwilling to extend Roe beyond abortion. You seem to applaud Roe's extension. I do not.

There's not a single part of that that makes sense.

How does Bowers show that the USSC was unwilling to extend Roe beyond abortion.

How have you ever gotten the impression that I applaud Roe?

Please fill in some gaps if you want to continue in this line of thought.

[aristeides]

In Bowers, the Supreme Court refused to extend Roe's right to privacy to homosexual sodomy. In Lawrence, the Supreme Court proceeded, through a camouflage of persiflage, to do precisely that.