[Jorge]

Your words betray you.

What a phoney response. I asked you to show where I promote the homosexual agenda.

You can't.

The fact is I've posted numerous times that I am a Christian who believes 100% with the Biblical definition of homsexuality as a sin...and adultery..and lying and gossip etc.

But because I don't believe in your throw the first stone homophobic hypocrite agenda..you therefore want to label me as a promoter of the gay agenda. Incredible.

[Polycarp]

The fact is I've posted numerous times that I am a Christian who believes 100% with the Biblical definition of homsexuality as a sin...your throw the first stone homophobic hypocrite agenda..

As I said...

[WOSG]

"But because I don't believe in your throw the first stone homophobic hypocrite agenda..you therefore want to label me as a promoter of the gay agenda. Incredible."

Jorge, your reasoning is abysmal. Just like the majority decision here. You are making a false dichotomy.

Reread Justice Thomas' statement. You can oppose the merits and value of sodomy laws and still recognize that they are constitutional. Even if you oppose outlawing sodomy, you should be very concerned by this court's extreme and faulty decision.

As for throwoing the word "homophobic", its funny, but your statement that you think homosexuality is a sin is EXACTLY what the Homosexual Agenda calls "homophobic". Why are you using the words of their agenda if indeed you dont support it? "Homophobia" is a mythical content-free term!