Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luis Gonzalez
Re your insistence that the states didn't have such a law, see in the Scalia dissent posted above:

Noting that "[p]roscriptions against that conduct have ancient roots," id., at 192, that "[s]odomy was a criminal offense at common law and was forbidden by the laws of the original 13 States when they ratified the Bill of Rights," ibid., and that many States had retained their bans on sodomy, id., at 193, Bowers concluded that a right to engage in homo-sexual sodomy was not "‘deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition,’" id., at 192.
I think Scalia contradicted you. Emphasis supplied.
419 posted on 06/28/2003 11:10:25 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies ]


To: lentulusgracchus
That's a law bannig all sodomy, not same-sex sodomy. The Texas law banned same-sex sodomy.

That was the point I was trying to make.

421 posted on 06/28/2003 11:23:55 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Cuba serĂ¡ libre...soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson