Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Technogeeb
The only thing you are exhibiting, and proving beyond a shadow of a doubt, is just how incredibly immature you are.

All you have done is call me a liar because you don't like the way I phrased my thought. There were in fact, no same sex anti-sodomy laws before 1970, had there been any, you would have posted them a long time ago and ended this.

There were anti-sodomy laws, but no law which was called a same sex sodomy law.

The laws before the 1970's banned sodomy for everyone, the Texas law banned sodomy for same sex couples only, the laws had changed, which is why the difference is drawn.

Now, grow up and debate issues, not semantics.
406 posted on 06/28/2003 3:25:26 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Cuba serĂ¡ libre...soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]


To: Luis Gonzalez
All you have done is call me a liar because you don't like the way I phrased my thought

That is because they way you phrased your thought was a lie. You have been given numerous opportunities to re-phrase it in a form that is not a lie, but you refuse to do so.

There were in fact, no same sex anti-sodomy laws before 1970

This is a distortion. Before 1960, all states had such laws, banning same sex (as well as heterosexual in nearly all cases) sodomy.

There were anti-sodomy laws, but no law which was called a same sex sodomy law.

All those laws applied to same sex sodomy. Some did not apply to heterosexual sodomy (such as Marylands's law mentioned in post 349).

The laws before the 1970's banned sodomy for everyone

There. That wasn't so hard was it?

407 posted on 06/28/2003 3:34:05 PM PDT by Technogeeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson