Put down the booze and read more carefully, I never said that.
What I am saying is that there were no same-sex exclusive sodomy laws in the United States until the 1970's.
Now, prove me wrong or go finish whatever it is that you're drinking.
Obviously, we have a failure to communicate ... here is your original Clintonesque emanation:
There was not a single law outlawing same-sex sodomy in this country 100 years ago. - Post 204.
Numerous posts since have explained to you the falsehood of the above statement, given the numerous sodomy laws on the books at the time that covered same-sex sodomy. Same-sex sodomy in the 1800s got you jail time if caught. Then you falsely say that what you were saying was:
"What I am saying is that there were no same-sex exclusive sodomy laws in the United States until the 1970's."
Okay, that's different kettle of fish. If you cant catch the distinction between the two, you really are lacking in logical faculties. Try rereading the responses to your posts and get up to speed on why they are different. and the insults are as pointless as your request: "Now, prove me wrong or go finish whatever it is that you're drinking." I've already refuted post 204 and other have many times. your latter, different statement, (yawn) what's your point? You are hankering to lock up heterosexual sodomites too?