Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RinaseaofDs
This may be a completely uninformed question (I'm an EE, not a physicist), but gravity is a force, right? Light is a particle, right?

There are four fundamental forces in nature:

Strong force
Weak force
Electromagnetism (EM) Light is an electromagnetic wave
Gravity

All of the fundamental forces are considered Exchange Forces. In other words the force involves an exchange of one or more particles.

The exchange particles are as follows:

Strong – The pion (and others)
Electromagnetic (EM) – The photon
Weak – The W and Z
Gravity – Believed to be the graviton

An addition by Physicist:

Note: The pion does mediate the inter-nucleon force. That force isn't fundamental, however. The fundamental force is the inter-quark force that binds the quarks into hadrons (such as protons, neutrons and pions), and that is what we usually mean by the strong force, nowadays. The force between hadrons is a residual color dipole interaction that is analogous to the Van der Waals force in electromagnetism.

21 posted on 06/23/2003 12:08:34 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: RadioAstronomer
The force between hadrons is a residual color dipole interaction that is analogous to the Van der Waals force in electromagnetism.

Glad you cleared that up.

25 posted on 06/23/2003 12:28:13 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets ("ALL THE NEWS THAT FITS, WE PRINT")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: RadioAstronomer
Exchange forces require particles, so by referring to light, they might has well been referring to electromagnetic force,

right?
35 posted on 06/23/2003 1:05:50 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: RadioAstronomer
PLACEMARKER
44 posted on 06/23/2003 6:45:28 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: RadioAstronomer; Physicist
>"The fundamental force is the inter-quark force that binds the quarks into hadrons (such as protons, neutrons and pions), and that is what we usually mean by the strong force, nowadays. The force between hadrons is a residual color dipole interaction that is analogous to the Van der Waals force in electromagnetism."

Cha, cha, cha... You know,
epicycles can explain
retrograde motion.

If you're willing to
pile complexity onto
complexity, you

need never give up
on Ptolemy's paradigm.
Sorry. Just rambling...

"So Ptolemy adopted an instrumentalist view --- this strange model is only an accurate calculator to predict the planet motions but the reality is Aristotle's model. This apparent contradiction between reality and a calculation device was perfectly fine in his time. Our modern belief that models must characterize the way the universe actually is [!] is a tribute to the even longer-lasting influence of Aristotle's realism."

77 posted on 06/25/2003 2:25:11 PM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: RadioAstronomer
Only four? What about chocolate and menopause?
138 posted on 06/25/2003 10:26:07 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson