Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHO CHIEF - "Smoking should be banned also in private homes"
NTB ^ | 6/15 2003 | NTB

Posted on 06/15/2003 5:47:49 PM PDT by Eurotwit

The head of the World Health Organization (WHO) is demanding a smoking ban inside private homes as well as in public areas. Comparing passive smoking to sexual child molestation, the head of the WHO argues that private homes should be subject to strict anti-smoking regulations.

Original article:

Fugelli om antirøyk-Brundtland - Helsefanatiker og fundamentalist

Gro Harlem Brundtland sammenligner røyking med barnemishandling. - Hun har forlatt fornuften og blitt helsefundamentalist, sier professor Per Fugelli. Han slakter Gros siste utspill mot røykerne.

- Barnemishandling. Det var i et intervju med NTB i går at Gro Harlem Brundtland plaffet løs mot røykende småbarnsforeldre, blant annet ved å slå fast at norske myndigheter har full rett til å forby røyking hjemme i nærheten av små barn.

- Alle er enige om at man ikke kan slå barn, selv om det skjer i hjemmet, sa den avtroppende WHO- lederen i intervjuet og gjorde det klart at man for å bli kvitt røykingen i hjemmene kan gå mye lenger med lovforbud enn det allerede er gjort i dag.

- Jeg er både skremt og skuffet over at Gro tar av på denne måten. Det som har kjennetegnet henne i årevis, er at hun forstandig har lagt vekt på vitenskap og nøktern dokumentasjon. Nå opptrer hun som helsefanatiker og fundamentalist. Hun har forlatt virkelighetens verden, og er tydeligvis villig til å ofre frihet og personvern for å renske også det private rom for røyking, sier Fugelli til Aftenposten.

Oppgitt. Professor Per Fugelli fortviler over Gro Harlem Brundtlands siste utspill mot røyking, der hun sammenligner det med barnemishandling. "Storemor ser deg" Professoren i sosialmedisin ved Universitetet i Oslo er også sjokkert over at Gro Harlem Brundtland med sine uttalelser rått stigmatiserer røykende foreldre som barnemishandlere. Han advarer mot at Brundtland tar til orde for et "storemor-ser-deg"-samfunn.

- Det finnes overhodet ikke dokumentasjon for å sammenligne vold og seksuelt misbruk mot barn, med røyking. Dette er fullstendig ute av proporsjoner. Det er jo ikke akkurat nedfall fra Tsjernobyl vi snakker om. Jeg og broren min hadde for eksempel foreldre som røkte gjennom hele vår barndom, men det ble da folk av oss også, sier Fugelli.

Brundtland har på sin side god tro på at vi i fremtiden ikke vil ha en større andel av røykere i verden enn på 5 til 10 prosent. Hun ser heller ikke bort fra at vi kan få en røykfri verden.

- Etter norsk lov er det er ikke lov å slå barn. Da den saken kom opp i Norge for rundt 20 år siden, var det noen som mente man ikke kan bestemme hva folk gjør innen for husets fire vegger. Dette var ikke flertallet enig i. De mente at man ikke kunne slå barn, selv om dette skjedde hjemme, sa Brundtland i gårsdagens NTB-intervju. Hun spådde samtidig at folk trolig vil se med helt andre øyne på spørsmålet om røyking hjemme i nærheten av barn om 10 år.

- Tenk to generasjoner fra nå, mellom 50 og 100 år. Da kan det være så ut å røyke at det ikke lenger er en del av kulturen, men noe fjernt som folk holdt på med i gamle dager. Jeg ser ikke bort fra at det kan oppnås. Om vi likevel bare kommer ditt hvor røyking er noe som 5 eller 10 prosent av befolkningen holder på med, har vi oppnådd et enormt resultat, sa hun.

- Velkommen etter Barneombud Trond Waage gikk allerede i 2001 ut og ba om røykeforbud i private hjem, fritidsboliger og kjøretøy der det er barn, i forbindelse Annonse Annonse

med en høring om endring i tobakkskadeloven.

- Jeg kan bare ønske Gro Harlem Brundtland velkommen etter. Vi voksne har mulighet til å gjøre valg når det gjelder røyking. Det har ikke en tre-åring. Derfor må vi jobbe frem lovverk som verner de minste mot helseskader av røyk, fastslår Waage.

Han viser også til at Island allerede har innført et forbud mot røyking i rom der barn er til stede.

(Excerpt) Read more at aftenposten.no ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: pufflist; smoking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Eurotwit
And what is this a smokescreen for?
21 posted on 06/15/2003 6:27:39 PM PDT by Domestic Church (AMDG...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit
The headline says it all. Not being able to read the script is a minor detail. Maybe soon we can ban socialism and communism from private homes, also. They've killed more children than second hand smoke.
22 posted on 06/15/2003 6:40:14 PM PDT by somemoreequalthanothers (Cause of deficit = uncontrolled government spending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit
Smoking should be a capital offense.
23 posted on 06/15/2003 6:44:21 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
You seem to be watching different anti-smoking commercials than I am. None of them have a "just say no" approach and all of them attack the "greed" of tobacco company executives.
24 posted on 06/15/2003 6:47:26 PM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit
Did a møøse bite her sister?
25 posted on 06/15/2003 6:49:04 PM PDT by Noumenon (Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn’t go away. -- Philip K. Dick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: somemoreequalthanothers
Actually, an intensive study taken by WHO proved that there was NO EVIDENCE of second hand smoke being harmful to anyone. The study wasn't publicized very much, of course, but Rush quotes it once in a while. There was also a new study done recently, also without much publicity, that came to the same conclusion. What little publicity this study has gotten has been demeaning towards the results, because that dirty old tobacco money paid for the study.
26 posted on 06/15/2003 6:49:06 PM PDT by basil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
"I wonder how long it will be until they have realized how many child molestors they have offended by comparing them to smokers."

LOL! The follies of Phariseeism.
27 posted on 06/15/2003 6:55:16 PM PDT by avenir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: basil
What little publicity this study has gotten has been demeaning towards the results, because that dirty old tobacco money paid for the study.

That's just what the antis want everyone to believe.

What the naysayers refuse to mention is the fact that for 38 of the 40 years of the study published in the BMJ it was funded primarily by the NCI and the ACS, among other anti-smoker groups.

What happened was they antis realized that the numbers coming out of the study were not going their way and so they stripped all the funding. In order to finish the work they had been doing the scientists took money from where they could get it. some of that money happened to come from a Tobacco Company.

The money didn't change the outcome of the study, it just allowed it to be completed - something the antis didn't want to happen.

If anyone notices there has been no real attack on the science of the study, just on the funding of the researchers.

I would like to know where those same attackers are when it comes to the funding sources of research that gives the results they seek????????? There is no attack, nor question.

28 posted on 06/15/2003 7:00:04 PM PDT by Gabz (anti-smokers = personification of everything wrong in this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: *puff_list; Just another Joe; Great Dane; SheLion; Max McGarrity
Get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US and then we will be able to rid ourselves of the evils of WHO.
29 posted on 06/15/2003 7:03:20 PM PDT by Gabz (anti-smokers = personification of everything wrong in this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: basil
Hmm as the anti-smoker say, IF being exposed to 2nd hand smoke 3 or 4 more harmful than smoking.. gee maybe we should encourage nonsmokers to smoke.. LOL
30 posted on 06/15/2003 7:05:53 PM PDT by Zipporah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit
And we think our fanatics are bad.
31 posted on 06/15/2003 7:08:10 PM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit
Two generations from a smoke free world......... my foot.
32 posted on 06/15/2003 7:09:15 PM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit
So should farting, but I don't see anyone speaking out about it.
33 posted on 06/15/2003 8:59:28 PM PDT by giznort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Paul, C'mon dude.... you might offend the fags on FR...
34 posted on 06/15/2003 9:00:30 PM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit
I demand strict "say hello to my .45" if you try it regulations.
35 posted on 06/15/2003 9:05:46 PM PDT by OOPisforLiberals
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit
Looks like the international community is hoping to cash in on the Phillip Morris peice of pie.
36 posted on 06/15/2003 9:06:59 PM PDT by Porterville (I support US total global, world domination; how's that for sensitive??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: giznort
"So should farting, but I don't see anyone speaking out about it."

Excellent point. Should be outlawed in elevators and buses, as a start. And farting and smoking combined is also an explosive issue! (Can't Who concentrate on real issues, like fixing potholes or something else?)

37 posted on 06/15/2003 11:18:07 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: All
Here is an english language version of the Aftenposten article for those interested. I read up on the original statements and it appears that it was proffesor Fuggeli that claimed that Brundtland compared smoking with sexual child molestation. In reality, it seems like Brundland only compared it with child molestation:

NORWEGIAN PROFESSOR:
«Brundtland is fanatical»
Av: Hanne Dankertsen 16. jun 10:28

Professor Per Fugelli says WHO director-general Gro Harlem Brundtland is a health fundamentalist after Brundtland stated she would like smoking to be forbidden near children, including in people's homes.

The WHO leader said in an interview that it should be possible to forbid smoking in people's homes, when children are nearby.
«Of course we should be able to forbid smoking in front of young children. Everyone agrees that one should not beat children, even it happens in the home», said Brundtland.


Fundamentalist
«Gro Harlem Brundtland has left reality and become a health fundamentalist», says Professor of Social Medicine, Per Fugelli.

«It both scares and disappoints me that Gro is saying this. For years, her trademark was to always stress the importance of science and factual documentation. Now, she speaks like a health fanatic and a fundamentalist. She has left the real world and is apparently willing to sacrifice freedom and the protection of privacy in order to ban smoking even in the private sphere», says the Professor.


Stigmatising
The Professor is shocked by the way smoking parents are stigmatised as child abusers and does not think smoking and violence can be compared:

«This is completely out of proportion. Smoking is hardly a Chernobyl disaster. My brother and I had parents who smoked but we still turned out OK», he says.
38 posted on 06/16/2003 4:33:01 AM PDT by Eurotwit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit
For years, her trademark was to always stress the importance of science and factual documentation. Now, she speaks like a health fanatic and a fundamentalist. She has left the real world and is apparently willing to sacrifice freedom and the protection of privacy in order to ban smoking even in the private sphere»

This could describe many of the anti-smoking nico-nannies here on Free Republic also.

39 posted on 06/16/2003 6:03:48 AM PDT by Just another Joe (FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: basil
There was also a new study done recently, also without much publicity, that came to the same conclusion. What little publicity this study has gotten has been demeaning towards the results, because that dirty old tobacco money paid for the study.

There was also a study done in the 70s on second-hand smoke; the author of the study had a letter in the Wall Street Journal a couple of weeks ago -- in response to a report on the recent study you mention. The 70s study found that an hour of exposure to heavy second-hand was the equivalent of smoking .004 cigarettes (or maybe it was .0004). It was paid for the American Cancer Society, who apparently dropped it into the circular file because it was never heard of again.

40 posted on 06/16/2003 6:09:55 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson