To: kevao
Gee, and all this time I thought my rights were guaranteed under the Constitution, and not dependent on my doing "a major makeover." You have no right to smoke in public. In fact most states had smoking bans in place at the time the constitution as signed.
361 posted on
06/04/2003 2:04:19 PM PDT by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: VRWC_minion
You have no right to smoke in public.What? Look, I don't know how you define "public," so let's leave that aside for the moment. The argument here is whether the government can ban smoking on private property like a restaurant or bar.
In fact most states had smoking bans in place at the time the constitution as signed.
Where do you get this stuff?
376 posted on
06/04/2003 2:17:48 PM PDT by
kevao
To: VRWC_minion
You have no right to smoke in public. Now I think you're showing your true colors.
379 posted on
06/04/2003 2:23:46 PM PDT by
Liberal Classic
(Quemadmoeum gladis nemeinum occidit, occidentis telum est.)
To: VRWC_minion
"You have no right to smoke in public. In fact most states had smoking bans in place at the time the constitution as signed. "
You planning to back that with a source?
To: VRWC_minion
You have no right to smoke in public. In fact most states had smoking bans in place at the time the constitution as signed.Following your logic, then Blacks have no right to vote.
503 posted on
06/05/2003 6:55:55 AM PDT by
kevao
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson