[tdadams]

Like I said, it behooves you to deflect the comparison because any honest look at the comparison damns the authors spurious misrepresentation that this "leather fetish" convention is representative of homosexuality in general.

[Clint N. Suhks]

Like I said, it behooves you to deflect the comparison because any honest look at the comparison damns the authors spurious misrepresentation that this "leather fetish" convention is representative of homosexuality in general.

It’s called DATA and the interpretation of said DATA is supported by the DATA. That means for that EXAMPLE the “convention” was a burden on society, which doesn’t make his conclusions wrong.