If doctors/scientists/researchers can't do this, why would you expect that I could? At least I'm taking all studies into consideration. Most studies, espeically recent studies, seem to suggest that there's a biological component to sexual orientation. That's a long way from being conclusive, but neither is it dismissive as you seem to suggest.
Researchers may never find a 100% definitive cause of sexual orientation. Even if they did, I have no doubt you'd find a way to impugn the findings.
To simply tout studies that agree with your argument and reject studies that tend to challenge your position, as you seem to be doing, is intellectually dishonest. Or, in other words, you're fooling yourself.
Can you show me anywhere I tout “my” studies over yours? You keep digging your hole deeper and deeper.
At least I'm taking all studies into consideration.
Yet another lie, you’ve only cited the ASU study that said "[The] findings are interpreted as supporting the argument for a biological basis in sexual orientation." while panning the studies I cited. You are rediculous and a liar.